Tuesday, December 15, 2015
Once Apon A Time, In America...
Short of another Civil War, Americans have reached a point verging on the loss of their Constitutional freedoms as ever before. Americans are rapidly moving toward having their Bill of Rights annulled by a President intent on ruling as a despot, making them slaves of a regime that rules as he wishes, ignoring the Constitution and Congress. Why is this happening? A brief review of the means put forth in Saul Alinski’s “Rules for Radicals”, written by a “community organizer”, outlines what Obama is doing as he seeks to turn America into a socialist state. It is a process that progressives/liberals have been pursuing since early in the last century. 1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.
2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).
6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.
8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
Of all the troubling aspects of the Obama presidency, none is more dangerous than the President’s persistent pattern of lawlessness, his willingness to disregard the written law and instead enforce his own policies via executive fiat…the President’s taste for unilateral action to circumvent Congress should concern every citizen, regardless of party or ideology. Americans will soon have little recourse against a government intent on controlling every aspect of their lives, spying on them, and arresting them for criticizing it. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe said, "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." I belive that since the the begining of the 20th century, our government (in coalition with Big Corporations) has slowly and deliberately taken control of its citizens for the simple reason of greed and power. We have allowed ourselves to be slaves to the machine, instead of pursuing the American dream. Now, it's too late. In my opinion, there is no American dream. Only a fabled tale of long ago. "once apon a time,in America, you could make something of yourself and be succesfull. Then, certain people found out how they could rule the world. The end. Is this how the American story of freedom ends for us? How did we go from a nation of rebels, euntrapanuers, and builders- to a nation of selfish,brainwashed,lazy people? Are we at the point of no return? I'll tell you right now, that if we the people continue to allow our government and big buisness to dictate and control our every move, then everything that our fore-fathers fought and died for will have been for nothing! Now if you are one of those that are ok with that, whatever. I, for one am not! Let's be the greatest nation again people! Merry Christmas!
Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Why Are Enemy Combatants Getting Due Process?
On September 11th, 2001 the United States of America was deliberately and mallicously attacked by Al-Queda (a muslim extremist group). Since that terrible day, it has been clear to every intelligent thinking American, that we are at war with Islamic extremism and the terrorism that comes with that. So, with that in mind, why are we continuing to allow enemy combatants the freedom to defend themselves in a civilian court?
Jurors in the trial of Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev are set to resume deliberations for a second day in the first phase of his federal death penalty trial. During the trial, Tsarnaev's lawyer admitted he participated in the deadly 2013 attack, but said his now-dead brother, Tamerlan, was the mastermind. If Tsaranev is convicted, the same jury will hear more evidence in a second phase of the trial to decide whether he is sentenced to death or life in prison. Seventeen of the charges against Tsarnaev carry the possibility of the death penalty. Three people were killed and more than 260 were injured when twin pressure-cooker bombs exploded near the marathon's finish line on April 15, 2013. Prosecutors told the jury that Tsarnaev, then 19, and his brother, 26, detonated the bombs to punish the U.S. for its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Tsarnaev's lawyers portrayed him as an aimless teenager who fell under the influence of his radicalized older brother.
In no way, shape, or form should this terrorist be allowed due process. We are at war. This enemy combatant should have already been executed. We need to send a message to the rest of the world that we will not bow down to terrorism in any form, and that we WILL punish any and all who attack the U.S. and their allies under the rules of WAR. Dzhokhar said he and his brother wanted to defend Islam from the U.S., which conducted the Iraq War and War in Afghanistan, in the view of the brothers, against Muslims. Later a CBS report revealed that a note scrawled by Dzhokhar with a marker on the interior wall of the boat where he was hiding said the bombings were "retribution for U.S. military action in Afghanistan and Iraq", and called the Boston victims 'collateral damage', "in the same way innocent victims have been collateral damage in U.S. wars around the world." So it is obvious that these two were in fact acting as enemy combatants. Let's end this ridiculous waste of tax payers money, and hang this f**ker from the highest tree!
Tuesday, April 7, 2015
Ted Cruz: The Hardcore Conservative Candidate
So, the first Republican canidate to run for president in 2016 is none other than Senator Ted Cruz from Texas. If nominated, will Cruz stand a chance at defeating Hillary and the socialist agenda that the Democrats have been indoctronating over the past eight years? Can he win over the hearts and minds of the average American voter? Cruz is, and will continue to be, the most conservative candidate in the field. He is also the front-runner to be the candidate whom all of the others privately — and maybe even publicly — detest. Cruz, of course, relishes that role, believing that it affirms just how much of an outsider he is to the political process. He will probably have a devoted and committed 10 to 15 percent following in a place such as Iowa; the question is whether he can grow beyond that loyal base or whether he is Michele Bachmann 2.0. Rafael Edward "Ted" Cruz (born December 22, 1970) is the junior United States Senator from Texas. Elected in 2012 as a Republican, he is the first Hispanic or Cuban American to serve as a U.S. Senator from Texas. Senator Cruz was born in Calgary, Alberta, Canada where his parents, Eleanor Elizabeth Darragh Wilson and Rafael Bienvenido Cruz, were working in the oil business. His parents owned a seismic-data processing firm for oil drillers. Cruz's mother, Eleanor Wilson Cruz, was born and raised in Wilmington, Delaware, and earned an undergraduate degree in mathematics from Rice University in Houston in the 1950s.
Cruz's father, Rafael Bienvendo Cruz, was born in 1939 in Matanzas, Cuba. As a teenager, he fought against the oppressive regime of Fulgencio Batista. He left Cuba in 1957 to attend the University of Texas. Rafael Bienvenido Cruz became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2005. Cruz's father eventually left the oil business to become a minister, and he is now a pastor in Carrollton, Texas, a Dallas suburb. So, with Ted being born in Canada, is he even eligible to run for president? Status as a natural-born citizen of the United States is one of the eligibility requirements established in the United States Constitution for election to the office of President or Vice President. This requirement was intended to protect the nation from foreign influence. Section 1 of Article Two of the United States Constitution sets forth the eligibility requirements for serving as president of the United States: No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States. The Naturalization Act of 1790 stated that "the children of citizens of the United States, that may be born beyond sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born citizens: Provided, That the right of citizenship shall not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States." This was also a concern for Obama and McCain in 2008. Two former top Justice Department lawyers say there is “no question” Ted Cruz is eligible for the presidency, in a new Harvard Law Review article that seeks to put to rest any doubt about the Texas Republican. I believe that this could very well be a serious issue in the comming months leading to election. From what I can see so far, Senator Cruz IS the choice for true conservatives, but is he the right choice for Americas future?
Ted Cruz has played a large part in the Republican fight to protect life, and has identified himself as “strongly pro-life.” He played a large role in several important abortion cases. He is in opposition to public funding of abortions. On the subject of birth control, Cruz believes that all insurance companies should have the ability to deny women insurance coverage for birth control at their own discretion, and is in opposition to churches providing birth control. In terms of illegal immigrants and what should happen to them, Cruz believes that those who enter the country illegally should be offered no path to citizenship or amnesty. He opposes the Obama administration’s current directive, which allows those illegal immigrants who were brought in as children to stay here, and exempts them from deportation, stating, “The Constitution places on the President the solemn responsibility to take care that the Laws be faithfully executed. President Obama has repeatedly defied the Constitution and flouted the rule of law. His latest decision to refuse to enforce our immigration laws is cravenly political, lawless, and wrong. We have a crisis in illegal immigration, and the federal government must get serious about securing our borders; this latest Obama policy is nothing more than an attempt to enact back-door amnesty, and I categorically oppose amnesty.” Cruz supports an increase in border patrol, and is pushing to triple the size of it. He has also worked towards efforts that would bring more severe punishment to felons who entered the country illegally. In regards to legal immigrants, Cruz recognizes the value that they offer America, and has said, “I strongly support legal immigrants who come here following the rules, seeking the American dream.” Cruz is an advocate for the military, including the growing of military forces. He believes in advocating to give members of the Armed Forces all of the rights and abilities necessary for them to keep America safe and secure. Cruz has vowed to push for a full repeal of the Affordable Care Act, and pioneered the leading proposal to take out Obama Care. He is in strong support of market-based health insurance. Cruz, like the Republican Party as a whole, believes that the path to a successful economy in America must be paved by a free market and less government controls. If there was a measurement of how conservative a canidate was, Ted would be up there in the "hardcore" area I belive. Since the Republican Party distanced themselves from many of the beliefs that Cruz hold dear, I don't think that he will get the nod although I do believe he is EXACTLY what this country needs, especially now. i urge you to do some research on your own and decide for youreselves, because this government control has got to end and we need a canidate that is sincere enough to help make that happen. We actually need to get back to "seperation of powers" and end this dictatorship!
Thursday, March 12, 2015
The Rise of the Socialst Republic of America; Part 2 (Education not Indoctronation!)
prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/
noun
1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
A systematic form of purposeful persuasion that attempts to influence the emotions, attitudes, opinions, and actions of specified target audiences for ideological, political or commercial purposes through the controlled transmission of one-sided messages.
I thought that I would lead off my literary rant, with the definition of "propoganda"; evidently there are some people out there who can not distinguish the difference between that and "fact". By the way a fact is something that has really occurred or is actually the case. The usual test for a statement of fact is verifiability, that is, whether it can be demonstrated to correspond to experience. Fact is sometimes used synonymously with truth.
I was part of an argument recently over the nonsense that Communism, as we know it in the West, was defined to us through propoganda. So in other words, the "commie scare" or "Cold War" as I like to call it that took place from 1945 to 1991, was a biased, missleading story perpetuated for the soul purpose of making us believe that Communism, and the politics that come with, would spread to the U.S. and eventually take over. Now if you are one of those that actually believe that Communism was a made up story to scare us, then allow me to do the honor of "bursting your bubble". Fact- the Communist Manifesto written by Karl Marx is still one of the most influential pieces of literature in the world. ie-the Bolshevik Revolution (1917), the Chinese Civil War (1927),and the revolutions in Central and South America from 1958 to 1986. All who were determmined and suceeded in replacing Communism with the "evil and self-serving Capitalism".
Fact- after WW II, Joseph Stalin went on record as saying that " Communism will eventually spread to every corner of the world." and thus the fall of Eastern Europe, North Korea, Cuba, and Veitnam.
Fact- after several socialist uprisings during the 20th century, the Communist Party of the USA was established in 1919 claiming to have 50,000 to 60,000 members (God only knows what their numbers are now!). Again this was not some sort of propoganda to scare us, these events ACTUALLY HAPPENED! In retrospect, anyone living in America in love with freedom, should have been, and still should be afraid to loose it! Especially with all that is happening now! Communism is definately making a comeback in this country, and just as we did then, we need to do something now before it's too late.
Instead of teaching our children the evils of Capitalism, and how America is imperialistic, they should be learnig of the struggles our forefathers endured in the name of freedom! We only have ourselves to blame for this. With this recent crusade to ban the American flag, and the continuing civil unrest that is perpetuating violence, and glamourizing the murder of our public protectors, it is all too clear to me where this country that I love so dearly is headed. This administration has so far successfully turned back the clock 50 years and brought with it the hate that I thought we had finally overcome.
This (I truly believe) is all part of this administations "change"! They will indoctonate and poison the minds of all who feel "opressed" thus the civil unrest and race rioting we are now unfortunately witnessing. They want to create anarchy to promote a new social order. King Barry will not be happy untill he has his grubby, commie, never worked a hard day in his life hands on everything! So, let us make a stand now, while we still have a free land to stand upon! God help us all!
Like I have stated in my blog and on my podcast, this is One of the signs for the beginning of World War III. Over the years certain members of our government have been slowly indoctrinating communism into our educational system into our workforce and then possibly into our police force. Eric Holder, condemning the police force;calling THEM corrupt, stated that the government should dismantle and take over our local police departments, if necessary. Don't you see what is happening here people? This tension cannot only be felt in Ferguson or Ervine, but also throughout the United States with the shootings of police officers for only trying to protect the businesses from being robbed and burned. This country has not been this divided both racially economically and spiritually since the great Civil War, I believe.If the good Law abiding citizens of this great country do not band together and do something now, then this could be the last hurrah for freedom! I close my rant with a great quote, from a great man- " Educate and inform the whole mass of the people... They are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty.
Thomas Jefferson. EDUCATION NOT INDOCTRONATION!
Thursday, February 26, 2015
Has World War III Already Begun?
There is a famous quote from Albert Einstein about war. He said “I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones." If World War 3 is here or coming soon, which country should be blamed for it? There are all sorts of theories floating around right now. Some blame Russia, while others blame Ukraine or Syria. Still others think the U.S. should shoulder the blame if the current global tensions escalate into an all-out war.But it’s still a little early to be playing the blame game. And besides, war is sometimes like marriage—it takes two (or more) to tangle. World War I (1914–1918) was regarded as the "war to end all wars" as it was believed there could never be another global conflict of such magnitude. World War II (1939–1945) proved that to be false, and with the advent of the Cold War (1945–1991) and the use of nuclear weapons, the likelihood of a third global conflict became more accepted. It was anticipated and planned for by military and civil authorities in many countries. Scenarios ranged from conventional warfare to limited or total nuclear warfare leading to the destruction of civilization. Ukraine’s defense minister threatened to fire up their nuclear weapons program again. Russia has already test-fired an ICBM missile to demonstrate its military power. Russian state TV also threatened the U.S. with a nuclear strike, although just theoretically at this point, saying that Moscow was capable of reducing the U.S. to radioactive ash.”
Moscow wants NATO allies to exit the crisis and stop backing Ukraine. But at this point it seems unlikely, as some journalists have said that World War 3 is already underway because of the battles between Russian and Ukrainian troops. Pope Francis also made comments which suggest that World War Three has already started and is being “fought with piecemeal, with crimes, massacres, destruction.” Meanwhile NATO officials are apparently considering how they can stop World War 3. In fact, Center for Strategic and International Studies spokesperson Kathleen Hicks thinks it could begin accidentally through “miscalculation.” U.S. Naval College Professor Nikolas Gvosdev has reportedly drawn comparisons between today’s tensions in Ukraine and the beginning of World War 1. He said World War 3 could begin “through unintended consequences” and that “an economically interdependent world does not necessarily stop it from happening.” Now enter the conflict in the Middle East, which has drawn everyones attention from the Civil War in the Ukraine. It seems that ISIS has become more powerfull and sophisticated than anyone thought, with brainwashed dumb-asses from all over the world wanting to join them. It truly seems, at least from my standpoint, that World War Three has definately already begun. So,
what constitutes a 'world war'? How many countries need to be involved? And who decides at which point a number of regional skirmishes can be grouped together and called a World War? At the time, who called the official start of World War 1 and World War 2? Has anyone noticed that although the term 'World War Three' is freely used in the alternative press and on the Internet, all the major news networks have stoically avoided using any phrase reminiscent of World War. So here is my attempt to define what constitutes as a " World War". A World War is a military conflict spanning more than 2 continents, in which at least 20 major countries participate in an attack against a common enemy, and which has the attention of the man-in-the-street due to the significant loss of life.
With that definition, we can agree that WW1 and WW2 were in fact World Wars (both wars involved some degree of participation from most of the world's then existing countries: Britain, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United States and the Soviet Union). Make no mistake, war is on. And it is happening now, only at a slower pace than many people expected. And it will have a huge impact on how you live over the next couple of years, when mysterious events happen that defy expectation and forecast. Now I am not trying to start a panic, I'm trying to wake the sheeple up! The big one is comming folks, and we need to prepare. We are our own worst enemy. As long as the global economy continues to collapse, and religous nut-bars rise to power, it is bound to happen. So what can be done, if anything, to stop this? This is a very heavy metaphysical question. It can't actuallly be approached with a popcultural mindset, so I have to point out the matter of those who live here on this planet are here for a reason, and as such, we have to deal with what exists here. History tells us that war is inevitable, no matter how hard we try to avoid it. All I can tell you is prepare for the worst, and hope for the best. Again I must re-iterate that this is not some doomsday message to mankind. Just a humble opinion from one who cares deeply of the future of his children, his country, and of human-kind. God bless and save us all.
Thursday, February 5, 2015
Si Vis Pacem Para Bellum!
King Abdullah of Jordan has swept aside any suggestion of caution in confronting Isis, declaring that his country would fight a “relentless” war against the jihadist group after the murder of one of his air-force pilots. As he arrived back in the capital, Amman, after cutting short a trip to the US to deal with the crisis facing his kingdom, he told state television: “We are waging this war to protect our faith, our values and human principles and our war for their sake will be relentless and will hit them in their own ground.” Hours earlier, Jordan had executed two prisoners connected to Isis’s terrorist predecessor, al-Qaeda in Iraq (AQI), who had previously been sentenced to death, and more were reported to be facing execution imminently. It is good to see that finally Arab countries with the majority of Islamic faith, are realizing that ISIS is the personification of evil and must be destroyed. If the Islamic faith is ever to progress and "get with the times", then other middle-eastern nations must join Jordan to rid the world of these stone age psycopaths. Iraq seems to be the only other muslim country willing to exterminate this vermin.
The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) used to have a different name: al Qaeda in Iraq. US troops and allied Sunni militias defeated al Qaeda in Iraq during the post-2006 "surge" — but it didn't destroy them.Today, ISIS and al-Qaeda compete for influence over Islamist extremist groups around the world. Some experts believe ISIS may overtake al-Qaeda as the most influential group in this area globally. Since pledging allegiance to al-Qaeda in 2004, the group's goal has been remarkably consistent: found a hardline Sunni Islamic state. As General Ray Odierno puts it: "They want complete failure of the government in Iraq. They want to establish a caliphate in Iraq." Even after ISIS split with al-Qaeda in February 2014 (in large part because ISIS was too brutal even for al-Qaeda), ISIS' goal remained the same. Today, ISIS holds a fair amount of territory in both Iraq and Syria — a mass roughly the size of Belgium. Iran says that they will never join the fight so long as the United States is involved. It’s like belling the cat: Everyone agrees it is a good idea, but no one is brave enough to make the attempt. So it is with the coalition mustering to battle the Sunni jihadists of the Islamic State of Iraq & Al-Sham (ISIS). Air strikes are OK, sending in ground troops not so much. François Hollande, the French president, announced the group’s formation at a meeting in Paris two weeks ago. Twenty-five nations, plus representatives of the Arab League, the United Nations and the European Union, agreed to help Iraq in its fight against the jihadists. The battle has since between extended to Syria. The coalition must do more than air strikes and humanitarian aid if it wants to desroy ISIS. All out war MUST be waged. Had we pussy-footed like this during WW II, we would all be speaking German and Japanese right now! The coalition needs to get their shit together and put an end to this evil now! They need to realize that sometimes war is the only choice you have when your back is to the wall. G.W. Bush knew this. The King of Jordan knows this. It's time for the rest of the free world to wake up! If you want peace, prepare for war!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)